Friday, October 14, 2005

A visit to a statue-in-progress


I dropped by the Stephen F. Austin statue-in-progress yesterday to see if they've attacked the Father of Texas' head to his body yet. They hadn't.

They're waiting for a big enough crane to take care of that importance stage of the building process, I was told by Chuey, one of the workers.

Chuey and Cesar were working on the outside of the statue, mixing cement and putting it in a bucket that would be hoisted up to someone located inside the structure. So what they're doing is patching cement on the inside of the thing. I didn't catch the name of the guy who was toiling in Stephen F. Austin's innards.

The worker named Cesar asked me in Spanish if I spoke espanol.

Poquito, I said.

Then, I asked him what his name was and where he was from -- in espanol. I was quite pleased that I remembered how to ask those questions in espanol ("Como se llama?" and "De donde es?)

He told me his name, Cesar, and that he was from San Luis Potosi.

Aha, I thought, now I can tell him that I once rode a train through San Luis Potosi, but I couldn't remember the Spanish word for train.

"What's the Spanish word for train," I asked Chuey.

"Train," he said.

Then I realized I didn't know the proper Spanish word for "rode" and gave up.

"Tell him I once rode the train through San Luis Potosi," I told Chuey, and he did.

Cesar, wearing a backwards-turned ballcap and wraparound sunglasses, pointed out in Spanish that Austin's "pistola" was there on the ground, a few yards me, resting on an old mattress.

I remembered what pistola means, and took a photo of Austin's long rifle, telling myself that those years of Spanish class in high school and college indeed were not wasted.

I took a few more photos and then left.

Later that night I realized the irony of it all. Here were two young Hispanic men, one of whom apparently didn't speak English and likely was an illegal immigrant, toiling to erect a statue commemmorating Stephen F. Austin, the "Father of Texas," who organized the first Anglo colony in a land that once belonged to Mexico before it was taken away by white men (and some Hispanic men) armed with pistolas.

Wonder what Austin would think of that. Wish I could ask him.

Later, I went over to the Varner-Hogg plantation, the state park that was once a sugar plantation worked by slaves in pre-Civil War days. The sad story of what's happened to that place might interest you, but that will have to wait for another day.
[photos on banjopics]

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

that would be weird to attack sfa's head, unless you were a sam houston state univ. fan, i guess!

jdallen said...

Okay - so what's the deal with Varner-Hogg? I haven't been over there in a couple of years.

I always thought they were lying, in the tours, anyhow. I mean, steamboats in that dinky little creek? I can't grasp it.

Anonymous said...

Re: Aug. 14 Report

Pardon, me Banjo. You got it all wrong concerning Austin and many, many other early Texas colonists in trying to play your racial card and create a division.

Stephen F. Austin, like my DeWitt Colony ancestors, were loyal Anglo immigrants to Mexican Texas, in good faith appreciating the generosity of the original liberal Mexican government and Constitution of 1824. They were in essence Anglo-Mexicans. Stephen most of all would have been most comfortable with descendants of the liberal and independent minded Northern Mexican state of San Luis Potisi working inside his statue.

Only until dictatorship and illegal disarmament by centralist Santa Anna did Stephen and those like him break with many of their freedom living Hispanic Texan compadres and fight for their independence. Read all about it on Sons of DeWitt Colony Texas, http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/dewitt.htm.

Anonymous said...

Re: Aug. 14 on Austin Statue

Hola Banjoman, D.G. again.

Good to see that modification:
"a land that once belonged to Mexico before it was taken away by white men (and some Hispanic men) armed with pistolas"
from the original:
"a land that once belonged to Mexico before it was stolen by white men armed with pistolas."

BTW, is it fair to change a dated blog without telling us?

Hispanic Texans played a role in winning by bloodshed the legitimate independence of Texas proportional to their number of total Mexican Texians (a majority were Anglo) at the time (read about it at Hispanic Tejano Patriots, http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/tejanopatriots.htm).

Now with the statement "...white men (and some Hispanic men)..." do I detect some sexism here? Texas women played an equal or even larger role as attested to by a lot of ole Texians (Read about it at WOMEN: As revealed in the writings of Texians).

Hasta la Vista.

Anonymous said...

Okay Banjo, what is going on at Varner Hogg? -- Hopper

Banjo Jones said...

don guillermo, i'm not trying to play a race card, and i believe i included 'hispanics' in the reference to pistols in the original post.

anonymous, thanks for pointing out the attacked typo...

j.d. & hopper, i've been computerless for nigh a week now and am tapping this msg out in a public library. hope to get the varner-hogg post up soon... thanks to all for reading and commenting...

Anonymous said...

Hola again, Banjoman, DG here. I forgot to leave the url on WOMEN in the eyes of Texian men, its http://www.tamu.edu/ccbn/dewitt/texwomen2.htm.

These girls by necessity knew how to "lock and load" a single shot muzzle loader in most cases more efficiently than their men, most rode a horse and jumped a 20 yd creek bed, and when needed shot true and staight as any of their men (not to mention truckin' water 100 yd or more under fire, keeping a fireplace going 24 hr a day, etc.).

Descendants of those same ladies are in the trenches, climbing the refinery tower ladders out in Brazosport, Iraq, and all over the state today (wo)manning the homefront, things have not changed! I hope you are fortunate to have met up with one of them.

jdallen said...

Are you trying to make me puke? Is it required for everyone to be totally, 100% politically correct, 100% of the time? You can't say ANYTHING at all without making totally sure you won't offend anyone?

Ridiculous.

Good thing you never talk to me or visit my site. You might come over and bash my mailbox or something.

dnsmac said...

Humm,

I must say I am quite confused with all this Mexico business. As a decentant of Moses Austin I have studied Texas history very deeply. And I remember that it was the Spanish goverment who he petitioned originally.
So if MExico won its independance from Spain to aquire Texas in the same manner that Texas won it's independance from Mexico, why wouldn't it be safe to say if anyone got took it would have to be Spain?
I can not understand how anybody, to use your words, can steal something then when they lose it cry about it being stolen from them?
Texans were tired of bowing down to the dictatorship of Santa Ana just as the Mexicans were tired of Spanish rule. They did the same thing the Mexicans did against Spain. The fought for independance and won.
So how is it stealing? How is it any different than what Mexico did to France and Spain? How can anyone with any intelligents not see that?
Seems to me that Mexicans are jelous that the "White-anglos" came to a wild country and made something of it that they have not been able to do in their own country.
Take look across the border. Is that what you want for the U.S.?
Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, And California were take from Mexico fair and square just like Mexico won it's independance from Spain and France. Deal with it!!

Anonymous said...

Hola Banjoman, DG yet again. Madre Mia! Yea Seuss Crees Toast! Geez Us Key Rice! Fantastic, got a good historical perspective thread going for ole Banjo here!

First housekeeping:
Re: The Spam Popups
Hey, I thought the porno popups were from ole J.D. triggered by his indigestion/acid reflux ("trying to make me puke"), but then the next one was about continuing education online, so much for that idea.

First, want to bring everyone in Brazosport area to the lapping waves south aware of The Texas Navies site at http://www.texasnavy.com/. There's some good stuff going on salvage, historical restoration operations on the coast.

Good points by dnsmac--Those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it--G. Santayana.

What about this idea? The estimated restoration of New Orleans and what was once the Louisiana Purchase is estimated to cost in inflation adjusted current dollars more than the original purchase from Napoleon (France) (who had gained it from Spain incidentally by trade and treaty). What about selling at least the Mississipi River basin from the Gulf to the Great Lakes back to France, have them restore it to 1800 standards, maintain the levees, etc. and we maintain rights of passage like the Panama Canal was at one time? We will even pay tolls, etc. to be negotiated. Now this is the ultimate in outsourcing!

Ole LaSalle (statue at Indianola) would have like this one for sure, yes, the guy who thought the mouth of the Lavaca River was that of the Mississipi! That's my kind of Texas guy!